But isn't that the downside of our IT age? Most of us now think we must become semi-expert in most subjects before attempting them...such as our taxes, our health care, and our sport. After all, if you read A/P as you begin orienteering, aren't you likely to be a
much better orienteer than the newbies who showed up at a meet 20 years ago with only a Silva brochure?
I'm not sure about tax prep, but in the medical fields, and prostate health specifically, there's been an explosion in
information,
opinion,
survivor stories,
advice, and even
real-time operations put up on the internet in the past 4-6 years. Not to mention a treasure-trove of
medical reseach papers previously only available in a select few medical libraries in the entire country.
No wonder a few months, or years, of reading these tracts provokes us to ask more questions, and question more "expert" advice we receive from our increasingly-harried medical professionals.
I'd love to go back to the kindly family doctor I grew up with...the chatty guy with the wonderful bedside manner. He
always seemed to know what to do. My parents practically
genuflected as they entered his office to receive "the Word."
But I don't think he exists any more. All this information, pro and con, may result in indecision and delay. And I'm sure docs don't particularly like to have their every word questioned...it probably
does drive them nuts. But isn't the outcome better? Aren't we improving our success rates in treating the prostate, as well as most other diseases? Won't an educated, pro-active patient ultimately receive the best care we can provide in the 21st century?