HOC WNL at Bramble End and Slippery Hill, or something. "Shitty" probably best way of describing the area. Bit of a disaster.
S-1-2-13-30-21-6-23-14-11-7-29-15-24-10-9-26-16-22-F. 365 points.
Think was third starter, behind Lucas and Tommi. We all ended up doing pretty much same thing and were together at 21 (but overshot - despite crossing several more fences than mapped). Realise afterwards that 21 and 6 not worth the time.
Lost several minutes crossing fence between 23 and 14 as it leaned very precariously if any weight put on it, and it was quite brambly. Did well to see it as my map appeared to have had ink rub off there (more later).
After 11 was a long unmapped fence, and a lot of contours up to 10 point control. Left for 29 and spent ages (minutes) looking for the overprinted crossing point (more later) before giving up and chancing the barbed wire. Then didn't find control in bramble very quickly - contour feature should be further north in relation to field corner below. Getting pretty fed up by this point.
With Lucas doing cross-bramble to 15, contouring and hitting very clean - he's navigating well for a newcomer to O, and his first ever WNL. Dropped down to lower path for 24 and brambles not too bad. Got out of wood with about 17 mins to go so started to head back.
Lost time at 10 as control was at least 2 contours lower than mapped so stopped far too early to see it. Struggling for pace up hills to 26 and 16, and really struggling for the short wooded path descent - for the really steep bit chanced the brambles, otherwise stood still in path and waited until slid to bottom - glad wasn't going the other way!
Got 22 fairly well and descent was ok, taken leisurely as had plenty of time. A very undeserved 2nd place, but well behind Ifor (but also well ahead of Tommi) - should be 985 WNL points so handicap still going up somehow.
https://www.strava.com/activities/254945531
Map printing. Unfortunately the waterproofed maps got lost in the post so we had non-waterproofed (but map bags were kindly provided - useful in rain). Print quality, to be honest, wasn't great. Plenty of forensic examination in the pub showed I was actually quite lucky - Lucas and Tommi had the planners' own inkjet printouts, mine was an inkjet printout of a PDF file that was the "master", and everyone else had a photocopy of my map - where black features were very thick. Area where the map had rubbed was actually tippex (organiser decided crossing wasn't safe), and the crossing point nobody could find near 29 was actually the original number for control 7, which had been rewritten in red biro more obviously. So I can't really complain about losing x minutes looking for a non-existent crossing.