Orienteering race (Lakes 5 Day 5) 1:15:07 [4] 10.57 km (7:06 / km) +345m 6:07 / km
shoes: Integrator August 2014
Hampsfell & Eggerslack
Late start, good contrasting area, feeling good; all set up for ending the week on a positive. In terms of the final result that was the case, but not in most other respects!
Heavy downpour as I was in the start lanes was not welcome, and I was slithering over the limestone pavement at the start.
Hit #1 ok, but on #2 I started looking too far north [20]
Not convinced by route to #3 (pretty much straight) but split looks ok.
#4 Drifted south (loathe to climb the hill more directly!) but corrected from the wall [15]
#5-#8 straightforward.
#9 Briefly confused at the crossing point, but headed for the correct thicket (despite there being more than were mapped) [15]
#10 Conscious decision to take extra care paid off as this control was spiked on a straight route.
#11 Unfortunately I proceeded to undo the good work almost immediately - went straight again (path to east looks preferable retrospectively) and missed above the crag, relocating in the big re-entrant. Game over (or so I thought) [120]
#14 Slightly overshot [10]
#15 Went via #11, small miss to SW in circle [15]
#16 It appears that I had the fastest split here - probably due to taking a route along the path a little way after crossing the wall which helped me recognise straight away that the bare rock was actually wooded.
#17 Went straight to the flag but read the wrong number initially [10]
#18 Didn't read the map carefully enough - looking on the boulder in the bracken to the W, then looped S before finally sorting myself out [40]
#19 Used the southern crossing point - extra distance but better running and a less severe climb - split holds up.
#20 Stupidly went via #4 rather than using the path to the N [20]
#21 Very visible - and this is where the course ultimately finished (61:14) after the end was voided.
#22 Avoided the undergrowth, using the southern crossing point (possibly marked higher than it was placed?) The control certainly was incorrect, as it was significantly up the slope from the crossing point, rather than down [240-void]
#23 Did this well - angry running.
#24 Too high [15-void]
Pretty unremarkable run - didn't feel fast either but generally seemed to be less off the pace than on previous days for some reason. Possibly attributable to some minor tracking up but that can't be the whole story.
Planning was a bit of a disappointment - especially the part in the eastern wooded section. Evidently the fact that they had to void the end of all courses using the western slope is also suggestive that something was missed in the planning / controlling process unfortunately.
3 of 34 (Class)
7 of 71 (Course)