NOL night sprint relay at Upper Coomera. I was 8th reserve for Victoria and we only lost one, so I was running in the public wave starts afterwards, which meant a head-to-head race with Ted. I fell into a number of traps and failed to see a couple of critical gaps (probably costing me 45 seconds or so on 8), and didn't really have a good sense of direction a lot of the time on a course which spun one around a lot, but I saved my most spectacular effort for last; having finally got a break on Ted over the last two controls, from the last control to the finish I somehow convinced myself that I'd run into a trap and needed to turn around when I had done nothing of the sort. Will take some beating for my most embarrassing error of the year.
We managed to fit between the heavier showers. A bit of hamstring soreness around 6-7 minutes in but it seemed to settle during the race (will see how it is tomorrow).
My route to the event took me past the (in)famous sign for the 'Approved Waterfront Development' that
became extremely waterfront a few weeks back. I noted here that one of the real estate agents on the sign was one Ben Boyd, a name with
some history of being associated with Australian property developments of questionable merit (although this one presumably doesn't own any slaves).
(The council don't seem to have been wildly enthusiastic about the approval, given that among the conditions attached to it was that every house in the development be supplied with two lifeboats and three days of emergency rations. This may explain why nothing has been built in the nine years since the approval was given).
Also paid a visit to Surfers this afternoon, getting the distinct sense that it's no longer the centre of the action (and being reminded of his advancing age by being ignored by the person who was handing out nightclub passes, or maybe they worked out how likely I was to turn up to a nightclub).
And word from the locals is that yesterday's effort is actually the second time a structure has collapsed on the building site, and that the developer has already been through one bankruptcy. I imagine the workplace safety authorities will be unimpressed (although I don't know whether Queensland law gives them the authority to do anything meaningful about their non-impressedness, issuing a unlikely-to-be-paid fine against a bankrupt not counting as "meaningful" in my book).