running (woods) 43:08 [2] 5.0 km (8:38 / km)
shoes: Inov-8 Oroc 350
Shorter Mystery Blazes, which I managed to follow successfully (bear right at stone wall, and stay on the right flank of the spur). Kinda taking it easy. Mulpus Brook was a little high after the rain yesterday, as I expected. I noticed part of a broken toilet lodged in a tree branch at about head height, suggesting that at some point it has flooded that much -- whoa! Total guess on the distance.
Note
I want to say something about the OUSA Rules Committee. I consider it a pretty sad state of affairs that these guys have so much work to do. I mean, baseball is a much more active sport, but I bet the MLB rules committee churns out very little new stuff every year. (There may be some stuff relating to drug testing, or sponsorship, or media interactions, but essentially nothing about the play of the game.) The international chess guys haven't changed the rules in eons as far as I know. But the OUSA rules people have a lot to do. Now, some of this is because the formats of the sport have been doing some shuffling around, thanks to the IOF changing its mind about what it thinks the media wants to see. And some is the result of technological developments, like electronic punching. But what have they been vigorously discussing lately? How close to each other you should be allowed to place controls. Something that you'd think would have been settled years ago. And this is for a sport where you might expect that there would be internationally established rules (I'll bet the US Soccer Federation rules committee does nothing). But this is all the result of a number of factors, among them the fact that the USOF Rules Committee was managed over the past decade by somebody who turned the rules document into a ball of fishhooks. There's also possibly the issue that some people feel that if they have authority, the only way that authority is meaningful is to exercise it, and if you're in charge of rules, that means making more rules. I will say that Clare does at least seem to recognize that the most useful thing to do is to straighten out the rules that we have, starting with the formatting -- for example, one recent edition had multiple rules all with the same number.
In contrast, I'm pleased to be on the Grievance Committee, where we consider our most pleasing and successful years to be the ones where we do absolutely nothing.
Not directly related but if you're listening, Charlie: the assertion has been made that people will invariably succumb to the temptation to cheat, given the opportunity. How do they deal with this in the Golden Knights tournaments? Is it an issue?