2nd, ~30s behind Craney.
Two small misses - route to #3 (excuse below) and then poor execution on #11 (knew the path went downhill but for some reason cut back down the stairs instead - my fault) which were mercilessly punished by an impressive run from Craney. Other than that I was never particularly at ease with the map and course.
I remembered reading a blog by Marten Bostrom last year complaining about how sprint races had changed over the last few years (
http://www.martenbostrom.com/news.html - dated 27th Aug 2010) and thinking at the time about how he sounded like a typical road-runner-orienteer who just wants to win races by having a chance to run faster than his competitors. But after Friday's race I think he may have a point. We had 28 controls in 14 minutes of racing. The range of split times was only 0:15 to 0:49. At that intensity of controls the subtle skills of planning and memorising controls ahead, intensity management and decisive route choice are not on the menu, replaced with frantically executing the current leg and glancing ahead to the next while trying to minimise hesitations. I think there is a place for this sort of planning in a good sprint race course but not at the expense of the other ingredients.
Now, to the map. Have I become such a highly strung sprint specialist that the slightest deviation from ISSOM standards throws me? I know I struggled with the PWT standard map of Summer Palace in China but I think I want to blame my first route choice miss on #3 on the print colours of the map. If you still have the warm up map (which I presume was laser printed) compare it with the litho-printed race map. The brown ink used for tarmac and contours is far darker on the race map. To my eye the warmup map is "correct". I'm not sure if there's a allowable range for the shades of brown like there is for buildings, but this doesnt look right to me. I think this also contributes to the problem of uncrossable walls seeming to continue where a contour comes out the end of them. Looking at the map in the cold light of day this seems to me to be the only reason for why I would have taken the route I did (right) to number 3.
Add to this the poor standard of printing (after this I'm not sure litho printing should be used for sprint maps) and I'm left with a slightly bitter taste - I've looked at a few maps and they are not all the same.
This wasn't supposed to turn into a ranty moan. I really enjoyed the whole weekend and these are all just challenges that we have to deal with to achieve our goals. Credit to Matt for a great run and to the ShUOC boys for keeping the pressure on.