ARDF 22:36 [4] 3.01 km (7:30 / km) +78m 6:39 / km
shoes: 201002 Asics T918N
I ran the (apparently 3 km) 80m ARDF course at Hammond Pond. We had more people than receivers, so in the interest of haste, I started three minutes after Lori, on control 4. This had the unfortunate consequence that Lori and I arrived at the next four controls concurrently.
I had assigned the large areas in which each of the controls were set, and that intimate knowledge of the control locations did make it difficult to simulate race-condition ignorance of the course. At the start, I pushed hard to control 4 and ended up about 100 meters from the control. While advancing on the control, I managed to drift about twenty or thirty meters to the left; I seem to struggle going straight on a bearing in the absence of feedback.
The logical order was 4, 1, 3, 2, 5; the appropriate times were 4 mins, 6, 8, 12, 15, and the finish at 20 minutes. I found 4 off cycle, missed a cycle at 1 (which I also found off cycle at ~10 minutes), and then ran cleanly. My effective finish time was 25:36.
This ARDF session was ineffective; I invested six hours of time for about twenty five minutes of actual ARDF training. The original plan was to run two such courses and a few short 5-10 minute 200m sprints. The rest of the physical activity was beneficial, but not the objective. The primary causes of the inefficiency were delays setting the course and more people than receivers, necessitating sharing. It's also hard to coordinate multiple exercises given the different speeds everyone has. I'm not quite sure how to resolve this, but ARDF sessions continue to be unacceptably inefficient.
Biking 52:54 [2] 16.18 km (18.4 kph) +53m
shoes: Trek 7.1 FX
Biking to Hammond Pond for ARDF training.
Orienteering 17:06 [3] 2.73 km (6:16 / km)
shoes: 201002 Asics T918N
Setting control 2 for the training in the northwest corner of the map. Since I was able to run largely entirely on trails, my pace was actually faster than while running the training course. One method for increasing the efficiency of training sessions is for a single individual to set all the controls in advance. We could rotate and absorb some of the time costs. More coaching and less waiting would be a significant improvement.