Late night (1 AM) running; temperature was -3 C, and as discussed in some other logs, I could have used a third glove. I had gloves, tights, and a windbreaker; I probably should have worn a heavier wrap and a hat.
My breathing was 4/4 throughout; I felt good and strong during the run, with some tightness in my calves and a few minor twinges in my ankles. My goal was a moderate intensity run; I tried to push my pace while breathing at 4 steps per inhale/exhale. I would eventually like to be able to comfortably run at 5 min/km in excess of one hour. I don't have any reasonable goals yet for my target paces for 10 km or more, e.g.
I went to
audible.com today and downloaded some of their free audiobooks (mostly material in the public domain). I'm considering a subscription, because listening to material while running is an excellent way to use exercise time, and I'm willing to pay $15/month if it will prompt me to read more. I will explore other audiobook cost options.
Today, I listened to part of the first presidential debate between Bush and Gore in 2000; a few observations:
- There was an amusing comment in retrospect where Bush voices his reservation about the policy of "nation building;" in general, Gore came off as more hawkish than Bush. Naturally, this sort of debate will invariably make the eventual President look worse because he actually has a performance to measure against.
- The contrast of the material of the debate to those of the most recent debates is tragically humorous; in 2000, they were making references to the generally strong state of the US military, the budget surplus (lol), and the most pressing problems of prescription plans for the elderly, how soon the national debt would be paid off, vouchers in the educational system, mandatory public school testing, and social security. Those problems are rosy compared to economic bailouts, two occupations, depression, foreclosures and the like.
- The problem of encapsulating information sufficient to describing the state of the country and certain key problems in 2 minute segments over a 90 minute interval is distressing. Especially given that many Americans will only glean significant information about political candidates from the media and debates, it's amazing our country is functional at all. The solution is not more effective debates (though that would help), but a more motivated and intelligent society. The American people lack the attention span, analytical capacity, objectivity, and motivation to make an intelligent informed decision; the recent movement of this past election cycle was a positive change from previous electoral charades. It's worth pointing out that the political establishment does not make this easier, and in some cases makes discernment and understanding more complicated, but the problem in general lies with the people (note that the state of the media is primarily defined by the interest and viewing preferences of citizens).
- Similarly, soundbytes about numbers and proposals as complex as tax plans, educational plans, and bailouts (e.g.) are inherently contrived; because these proposals have extensive complexity, they can be portrayed in virtually any light given the appropriate statistic. What is needed is an objective team of nerds breaking down and presenting data more efficiently; I'm not sure what the most efficient way to do that is, but a soundbyte is certainly not it. I suppose Nate Silver is a good proxy for this "Team of Nerds." Once again, we encounter the limited attention span problem of the American people.