I was reading the thread about mappers at:
http://www.attackpoint.org/discussionthread.jsp/me...
I used to wonder why more people didn't try to combine mapping with "elite" training. In fact, I used to argue with people about that - making the case that I thought it could work.
My personal experience is that I was able to combine a reasonable level of training with a reasonable level of mapping. I moved to Sweden with a fieldchecking job lined up. I had a visa that allowed me to do the mapping, but only be paid room, board and a small amount of money. It worked out really well. I mapped around 3-5 hours a day, put in a good run, and then got lots of sleep. I was able to compete a lot (since this was in Sweden). And, mapping is good training for orienteering. You get a lot of technique training and even the physical effort is good without really wearing out your body.
It isn't ideal. It isn't like having a sponsor pay you a salary for doing nothing but orienteering professionally. But, that version of ideal just isn't going to happen to almost anyone.
I think what I did was a really good way to make the most of the opportunities I had.
One of the most interesting things about getting the work and the visa was that it took a lot of time to find a club that would host me (thanks Lunds OK!). But, once I got over there, I had lots of offers to do more mapping. In the end, I did work on a couple of maps for Lunds OK and then a map in Linkoping (I can't remember if it was IFK Linkoping of Linkopings OK).
I only did that for about half a year and then started in school (which was also another story about visa issues).
Some people look for opportunities, some people look for reasons not to do something.
And a huge thanks to Peo Bengtsson who helped me get all of this set up. I tracked him down at an A-meet in the US when he was leading one of his tours. If I remember right, it was at an event in Ohio. I sought him out and asked for help, and he helped.