Put on an orienteering event at Dana Park. Kids ranged in age from 3 to 13, but median was probably 5.
First experience of a control:
Map:
I didn't have any help, and there were a lot of kids (about 50) (many "clamoring"). I didn't get to spend as much time with each kid as I'd have liked, as a result. It was really interesting to see how the kids did with this relatively hard challenge: a "real" O course without numbers on the controls (you really had to know where you were on the map), for pretty young kids who'd not done it before. A lot of kids didn't really get it; some of the older kids did. I was particularly intrigued that this pair of relatively young girls got every single control right:
This got me thinking again about race and orienteering. I mean, orienteering is mostly a white person's sport. When I ran an after-school club last fall, I was hoping for a diverse crowd, and didn't get it. I think I need to recruit more aggressively. But I think the economics are a challenge. An after-school club is not as reliable as som regular after-school arrangements for working parents; it costs something, even if not much. Orienteering is also tough because to get serious, to get to the real woods, you need transportation. Maybe I should just find out more about public transportation; can we get to the Fells on the T + bus?
I also started daydreaming again about starting a Cambridge league. Samantha's school, wherever that is - Boston area league, maybe. Does Kristin H have kids in school in the area yet? That could be another one. The lady who arranged for me to be part of this "arts in the park" series today invited me to come and teach at 4 other schools in Cambridge this fall. If I could find four NEOC volunteers for those slots, this could start to gather some momentum.
Anyway, these girls really had the spatial reasoning down well. I told them that they must be good at math. They didn't seem to know what I meant. I asked how high they could each count. One girl said she could get up higher than 100.