A shorter run based on central Geneva. The original plan was to meet up with a work colleague who's over here for something else, but he wasn't at the appointed meeting spot, so after going round the block three times I kept going. (I thought he might have overindulged at his conference dinner last night, but it turned out his phone alarm had reset itself to Australian time).
There was no snow where I was staying, but seeing quite a lot of it on some cars driving into town suggested that it wasn't too far away, and so it proved - climbing 20 metres in the old town was enough to put me above the snowline. There weren't huge amounts, and nothing on the road (just on grass, parked cars and similar purposes), but still more than I've seen for a while. Quite a reasonable run again with no injury issues; this is starting to get encouraging, although the 90 minutes I'm planning for tomorrow will be a sterner test.
I then went to work to discover that a journalist who I've worked with extensively over the years has gone public with exactly how the Australian deals with climate change (
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2010/11/the_austra...). You can reasonably assume that what's been reported has a ring of truth. If any of the actual or threatened lawsuits actually get as far as a courtroom (unlikely in my view) I suspect I'll probably find myself in the witness box at some point, not least because on occasions she would send me copies of what she'd filed and a comparison with what actually got printed has the potential to be relevant. A court case over the Australian's coverage of climate science is an appealing prospect in some ways, although those who have to pay the legal bills may not feel quite the same way.
And some results I got today mean I'll have something of a bombshell to drop myself next Thursday. Watch this space...