Split Analysis
Urban Festival of Orienteering, Joaquin Miller Par: Sprint
Tundra/Desert
median leg score: 82.8
calculated time lost: 1:10 (+5.8%)
| split | cumulative total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | dist | time | place | delta | score | lost* | pace | dist | time | place | delta | pace | comments | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. | 101m | 41 | 5 | +16 | 64% | 66.7 | 6:45 | 101m | 41 | 5 | +16 | 64% | 6:45 | The route is here. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. | 170m | 2:42 | 7 | +1:35 | 142% | 46.5 | 1:20 | 1:10 | 15:52 | 271m | 3:23 | 7 | +1:46 | 109% | 12:29 | On the downhill, I fell and completely lost concentration. As I ran up the side of the reentrant, I could see François looking for another control. No Sprint control was nearby, as I could tell, so I wasn't the only one deeply in confusion there. After making a loop, I bailed to the trail and got the control by bouncing off the clearing with the cliff. I had seen the clearing on my first try, and had I interpreted it correctly, should have had no problem getting it cleanly the first time. | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3. | 121m | 54 | 1 | -3 | -5% | 103.7 | 7:26 | 392m | 4:17 | 5 | +1:43 | 67% | 10:55 | From here on, I ran hard, trying to catch up. My concentration was still lacking, and some of the concentration that is necessary for a proper running technique was lacking, too. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. | 141m | 1:00 | 5 | +7 | 13% | 91.1 | 7:05 | 533m | 5:17 | 5 | +1:50 | 53% | 9:54 | So I twisted my ankle on this leg. It was not serious. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. | 75m | 29 | 4 | +6 | 26% | 82.8 | 6:26 | 608m | 5:46 | 5 | +1:54 | 49% | 9:29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. | 125m | 1:01 | 5 | +21 | 53% | 71.6 | 8:08 | 733m | 6:47 | 5 | +2:15 | 50% | 9:15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 7. | 244m | 1:59 | 5 | +35 | 42% | 76.8 | 10 | 8:07 | 977m | 8:46 | 6 | +2:50 | 48% | 8:58 | Twisted the same (R) ankle on this leg. I think Mikkel went straight, with a down-and-up, and it was slightly faster. With my brain and legs in disarray, I ended up falling back on default technique, meaning high-and-around route choices. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 8. | 635m | 5:37 | 3 | +55 | 20% | 93.5 | 10 | 8:50 | 1612m | 14:23 | 4 | +3:45 | 35% | 8:55 | The high-and-around was clearly the way to go on this one. I could have been cleaner, probably going straight back to #6 was a 10-second advantage similar to when going down to #7. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 9. | 107m | 1:01 | 7 | +14 | 30% | 83.1 | 9:30 | 1719m | 15:24 | 5 | +3:59 | 35% | 8:57 | I went back to the trail for a clearner attack. It was probably not worth it. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 10. | 297m | 3:33 | 2 | +12 | 6% | 103.8 | 11:57 | 2016m | 18:57 | 3 | +4:11 | 28% | 9:23 | This is the one I nailed, a decisive leg. I executed the best route 100% cleanly. The confidence and concentration finally recovered. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 11. | 175m | 1:34 | 5 | +23 | 32% | 80.1 | 15 | 8:57 | 2191m | 20:31 | 3 | +4:25 | 27% | 9:21 | I went too far to the right, pulled in my usual reactive fashion into where the going was easier. Joe S was taking pictures. | |||||||||||||||||||
| 12. | 104m | 30 | 3 | +2 | 7% | 96.7 | 4:48 | 2295m | 21:01 | 3 | +4:26 | 27% | 9:09 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 13. | 44m | 14 | 6 | +5 | 56% | 78.6 | 5:18 | 2339m | 21:15 | 3 | +4:31 | 27% | 9:05 | |||||||||||||||||||||
* red = reported, gray = calculated