Register | Login
Attackpoint - performance and training tools for orienteering athletes

Split Analysis

MNOC Whitetail Woods: Red

toddp

median leg score: 69.9
calculated time lost: 4:56 (+6.6%)

splitcumulative total
#disttimeplacedeltascorelost*pace  dist  timeplacedeltapace comments
1. 201m 1:42 6 +44 76% 69.3 10 8:27   201m 1:42 6 +44 76% 8:27 Lost some time for reading the map. I could not see the detail on the last half of the leg due to aging eyes. I need to get a magnifying glass or wear my glasses instead of contacts.
2. 423m 3:06 8 +1:14 66% 69.9 7:19   624m 4:48 7 +1:58 69% 7:41 Picked a good route and executed well.
3. 164m 1:36 5 +31 48% 81.3 9:45   788m 6:24 7 +2:29 63% 8:07 Had trouble reading the detail near the circle. Eye problems again. Slow on the uphills.
4. 204m 1:53 11 +40 55% 67.0 9:13   992m 8:17 7 +3:09 61% 8:21 Handrailed the reentrant and then used the compass to run a straight bearing accross open ground.
5. 526m 3:57 8 +1:24 55% 72.3 7:30   1518m 12:14 7 +4:33 59% 8:03 perfectly executed, and fast, for me.
6. 336m 4:14 7 +1:14 41% 75.1 40 12:35   1854m 16:28 7 +5:27 49% 8:52 With the risk of the marsh I should have cheated furthur north before crossing the marsh. Once the opposite shore was breached, I did not have a good plan to find the spur.
7. 224m 2:28 9 +1:09 87% 61.9 10 11:00   2078m 18:56 8 +6:36 54% 9:06 Hit the fence 20 meters south of the control. Should have honed the bearing as I closed in. Was tired from climbing the hill.
8. 737m 6:50 7 +2:37 62% 72.2 30 9:16   2815m 25:46 7 +9:13 56% 9:09 Leaving the the circle I did not have a good understanding of the leg. Was afraid of crossing marshes after the last one and did not see a direct marsh crossing as an option until I saw how dry it was from above. I should have headed straight for the trail junction on the opposite side of the marsh. Once the error was realized, I corrected and executed well.
9. 648m 5:53 8 +2:15 62% 70.3 9:04   3463m 31:39 7 +11:28 57% 9:08 From the top of the hill I took a bearing on a barn and jut followed that in until I sighted the distinct treeline.
10. 379m 2:59 6 +52 41% 79.1 7:52   3842m 34:38 8 +12:20 55% 9:00 Well executed on a bearing thru some obstacles. Leaving the circle I enjoyed running thru the pines so much that I changed my plan to include more eastward white woods.
11. 464m 4:51 10 +1:52 63% 67.0 10:27   4306m 39:29 8 +14:09 56% 9:10 A good plan executed pretty well. A little too slow dodging the campers.
12. 912m 8:08 6 +2:54 55% 69.5 8:55   5218m 47:37 7 +17:03 56% 9:07 Not bad.
13. 545m 11:53 13 +7:13 155% 46.5 4:00 3:58 21:48   5763m 59:30 7 +24:16 69% 10:19 Cut thru the crossable marsh. Should have read the vegetation species before committing to the crossing. Note to self. READ THE VEG BEFORE COMMITTING!
14. 269m 3:24 8 +1:15 58% 72.4 25 12:38   6032m 1:02:54 7 +25:31 68% 10:25 Was waling on the downhills, completely cashed out by the marsh crossing on the previous leg. READ THE VEG BEFORE COMMITTING! Well, I did and this crossing went better. did not have a clear idea of what to do once across. Brain not thinking clearly due to the previous leg's exertions. READ THE VEG BEFORE COMMITTING!
15. 148m 1:54 8 +37 48% 69.9 12:50   6180m 1:04:48 7 +26:08 68% 10:29 Not bad. Slowly executed. Tired. I am thinking that I should run down on Green or brown from now on.
16. 315m 3:23 9 +1:20 65% 64.0 10:44   6495m 1:08:11 7 +27:28 67% 10:29 Nicely done. Read the contours well.
17. 1001m 8:48 10 +3:52 78% 62.1 20 58 8:47   7496m 1:16:59 8 +31:20 69% 10:16 Did not execute the route choice well. Kept running into the trail when not expecting to. The norther route looks better to me in hindsight. Did not have a good plan for the attack. Why didn't I contour thru the white woods at the end. I was tired.
18. 214m 1:42 11 +43 73% 65.4 7:56   7710m 1:18:41 8 +31:55 68% 10:12 Not bad.
19. 83m 32 13 +9 39% 74.0 10 6:25   7793m 1:19:13 8 +32:03 68% 10:09 Did not hustle to the finish. Too slow.

* red = reported, gray = calculated

back to race