Register | Login
Attackpoint - performance and training tools for orienteering athletes

Discussion: Bolt!

in: Orienteering; General

Aug 16, 2008 3:05 PM # 
Hammer:
Watching Donovan Bailey win the 100m in Atlanta was a pretty damn awesome thing to watch BUT watching Bolt just run sub 9.7 and pretty much jog through the final 20-25m was the most amazing pieces of athleticism I've ever seen. He just made a lot of world class athletes look absolutely normal. He is so far ahead of the rest of the World. Sub 9.6 someday soon.

In orienteering who have the Bolt's been?

Annichen?
Tero
Advertisement  
Aug 16, 2008 4:55 PM # 
Didsco:
He's got a serious chance of beating Johnsons 200m record 19.32, and I didn't think I'd be saying that for a long while.
Bolt's been outclassing the opposition since he was a kid, even won World Juniors 3 or 4 years too young....so he might just not be on the juice??
Aug 16, 2008 7:24 PM # 
Hammer:
No not "juice" - Actinen A

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/sport/olympics20...

After Bailey and Christie won 100m Gold for CAN and GBR it is great to see a Jamaican born 100m gold winner win for Jamaica.
Aug 17, 2008 1:05 AM # 
GOUGER:
He is not human.....he shut it down at 70 m and ran with his arms out.....sub 9.6....how bout sub 9.5!!

Very impressive to watch....those long strides sure eat up ground quick. He will win the 200 as well no doubt.
Aug 17, 2008 3:40 AM # 
Hammer:
>He's got a serious chance of beating Johnsons 200m record 19.32, and I >didn't think I'd be saying that for a long while.

Although as most Canadians know Michael Johnson wasn't very good at the 150m distance. :-)
Aug 17, 2008 8:51 PM # 
graeme:
Bolt is unbelievable - I've seen nothing like it since Michael Johnson. Nor do I see any reason to think he's getting any advantage over the others from use of "juice".

Here in Scotland we also remember the big showdown over 150m. And that the fastest man in the world over the distance that day, despite easing down in Bolt-like fashion, was, um, Ian Mackie...
Aug 17, 2008 11:39 PM # 
igoup:
I really wish he had run all the way through the line. I'd rather see the 9.5X than the celebration. But he's young so I hope there will be plenty more opportunities to see him do it.
Aug 18, 2008 2:28 AM # 
z-man:
He pretty much made top elite sprinters look like, well... not so much elite after all, that was awsome! I don't know how you really prepare yourself to beat this guy when he is that much faster!
Aug 18, 2008 4:26 AM # 
slow-twitch:
Have heard a lot about how he's the "wrong" shape for a sprinter - mostly regarding his height. I think though, the more we see of those 10 paces in the middle of the race where he blew it apart, the more tall sprinters we'll also start to see....
Aug 18, 2008 10:28 AM # 
naomi:
yes, i think the same way. the height might be a "problem" at the start, where he "just" ran as fast as the others but in the middle part when it comes to the to top speed he is simply faster and he got away.
Aug 18, 2008 11:46 AM # 
Ryan the Lion:
He had the slowest reaction time in the race but was leading after 3 strides. His height is no dis advantage because he can carry himself like a 6ft guy, but with the stride length of an 8ft guy. He also said he is not interested in world records -yet- and just wanted to enjoy the event and get the gold, which he did after 40m of the race.
Aug 18, 2008 2:29 PM # 
mindsweeper:
That article is terrible. It mentions 'Actinen A' three times but never explains what it does.
Aug 18, 2008 6:01 PM # 
naomi:
@Tomr_R: you found the reaction times? are they on a webpage? would be interesting to see them? a link would be perfect! :)
Aug 18, 2008 6:08 PM # 
Ryan the Lion:
i was wrong, he was 7th fastest. This is interesting though:

http://www.sportsscientists.com/2008/08/beijing-20...

it would be interesting to compare 10 split graphs with the other runners as well as some previous top guys Like Greene, Bailey, Lewis etc.
Aug 18, 2008 7:02 PM # 
IanW:
Reaction times are all on official results:

http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/AT/C73A/...
Aug 18, 2008 8:20 PM # 
bishop22:
I'm assuming he had a strong incentive to NOT break the world record (or to minimize the time dropped from the WR). I've gotta believe a bonus for a world record would be much more lucrative at a European track meet than he could receive based on his Olympic performance.
Aug 18, 2008 9:43 PM # 
jingo6390:
I imagine there are fincancial incentives to breaking the WR many times as opposed to a few times
Aug 18, 2008 9:49 PM # 
Ryan the Lion:
e.g. Isinbeyeva in the Pole Vault. She gets $50000 per record.
Aug 18, 2008 10:31 PM # 
EricW:
In my memory, another pole vaulter, Sergei Bubka (sp?), takes the cake for professionally managing world records, although perhaps on a different pay scale.

Also in my memory, only Bob Beamon had a more astounding track&field/athletics performance than Bolt, and I don't get the same feeling as with Ben Johnson's yellow eyed, bulging-everything exhibition.
Aug 18, 2008 11:51 PM # 
jeffw:
Vasily Alexeyev, the great Soviet super-heavyweight weightlifter, was supposed to get an extra bonus if he beat the world record 100 times. He only made it up to 80.
Aug 20, 2008 3:01 AM # 
mindsweeper:
Who are the orienteering world record holders? (A propos this other thread"...)
Aug 20, 2008 3:08 AM # 
JanetT:
Int'l results through 2006
[Thanks, Blair.]
Aug 20, 2008 11:03 PM # 
mouse136:
wasnt the 200m final another display of blowing away the best sprinters in the world. If Bolt is not on the "juice" then we have some pretty exciting sprint races to watch in the next few years (or 10 years as he is only 22 yo today). It has made people want to watch the sprints again. I thought Michael johnson's world record in the 200m was going to stand for a long long time. So did he. Good run mon.
Aug 20, 2008 11:16 PM # 
Ryan the Lion:
Before any haters throw the D word about, here is Bolts PB progression. No miraculous PB smashes or sudden bursting onto the scene, just years of hard work and mind boggling talent.

400m
2001 age 15 - 45.35

200m
2001 age 15 - 21.73
2002 age 16 - 20.58
2003 age 17 - 20.13
2004 age 18 - 19.93
2005 age 19 - 19.99
2006 age 20 - 19.88
2007 age 21 - 19.75

100m
2007 age 21 - 10.03
Aug 21, 2008 5:18 PM # 
matzah ball:
Rashid - how bout the 1500 race final? I can watch that over and over and over again. A lot of movement from front to back, race dynamics. Those guys look like they are sprinting the whole way, and then find another gear at the end. Too bad Lagat looks like he's suddenly bursting off the scene.
Aug 21, 2008 5:29 PM # 
Ryan the Lion:
Ramzi, now theres a guy im suspicious of. Ran amazingly in Helsinki, vanished for a year and then re appeared at the Olympics with no previous form for the last 18 months. Hmmmm.
Aug 22, 2008 2:51 PM # 
graeme:
Tom: You do have high standards - calling a silver at the World Champs "no previous form"!

Meanwhile, adding Bolt's progression this year is the exact opposite of steady progression ...

2001 age 15 - 21.73
2002 age 16 - 20.58
2003 age 17 - 20.13
2004 age 18 - 19.93
2005 age 19 - 19.99
2006 age 20 - 19.88
2007 age 21 - 19.75
2008 age 22 - 19.30

100m
2007 age 21 - 10.03
2008 age 22 - 9.69 (at 9:60 pace)

Not that steady progression proves anything: Dwain Chambers was British Schools Champion and Junior World record holder.
Aug 22, 2008 2:56 PM # 
Ryan the Lion:
i as talking more about this year, but yes that is good, but he really does appear at big races and than mysteriously vanish again.
Aug 22, 2008 4:20 PM # 
naomi:
This whole discussion about "forbidden stuff" is completely senseless. do you think that one of the guys in the sprint finals is clean?
Aug 22, 2008 4:29 PM # 
Ryan the Lion:
Even if they are all dopers, Bolt is still the greatest doper on earth and has crushed all of his cheating opponents. I believe he is clean though. Look at all of the other dopers of the past. They have all been very muscular, power runners, Bolt is different. He isnt as muscly and his height and stride length can account for a lot of his pace. In this day and age I feel for the sake of the sport we should be hopeing that these guys are clean and not blaming them straight away. I feel that some of Bolt's sudden PB increase this year is down to a young guy whose potential has been slowed over the last few seasons due to injury and is only now making good his potential. Most of his 05' and 06' seasons were ruined by injury.
Aug 23, 2008 9:57 AM # 
naomi:
more muscles doesnt mean more doping... and I tell you, none of them is clean. but I think that if nobody would dope, bolt would still win ... maybe no WRs but he would be the #1! :)

This discussion thread is closed.